Just Starve

Just Starve

If you are an intelligent person, then explain to me why one would end up in jail if one starved a puppy to death? How about a kitten, horse, cow, turtle, or even a snake? Attacks have been made on medical research labs that have set back cures for human illnesses twenty or more years because rats are used in the testing. The attackers were put on probation. In one case a security guard was killed in one of these attacks. The people involved were charged with trespassing and destruction of private property.

Progressive thought is that it doesn’t hurt to starve to death, just look at the MSM these days and their hired guns called experts and medical doctors. None of the ones I have seen look like they are starving to me. And yet I get an advertisement a few times a month asking me to contribute to starving children around the world. How does that go now? Oh yeah, "It is a basic human right to not go to bed hungry."

Everyday in the United States of America there are protests and millions of dollars spent to try and stop the inhumane practice of the death penalty. Everyday there are protests worldwide against death caused by man against man. Everyday the are protests against the lack of freedom and rights for women around the world.

There is a woman in Florida, the United States of America, the leader in bringing freedom to people worldwide, who has been ordered killed by starvation. This woman laughs, cries, smiles, watches television, and yet is not alive per the courts in the state of Florida. The court has placed her husband’s request to kill her above her right to live. The lives of a dog, cat, or even a lab rat have more value than the life of this woman. If she were a dog, cat or lab rat she would have to be humanely put down, put to sleep with a drug. Progressive thought is that the death penalty is "cruel and unusual" punishment when death takes place in seconds. The estimate is this woman will take up to two weeks to starve to death. How many reports have mentioned that her feeding tube is also the way she drinks? Which will kill her first, hunger or thirst? My bet would be on the thirst.

So I ask the question again. Why should anyone be put in jail for starving a puppy to death? I am not even going to get into the fact that the spokesman for the husband is his common law wife, who lives with him, has two children by him, and prefers to be called his fiancee. I am not going to debate the financial side of the picture, which includes life insurance and rewards from lawsuits. That would be crass of me. I guess I shouldn’t even mention that this woman ordered killed has parents and siblings who have agreed to take over all care which will include the cost of care. No, the husband wants her dead and the courts agree.

Why should anyone be punished for starving a kitten to death when they can starve to death a woman who can laugh with them?



Update:

George, the ex-press secretary to Clinton was just on the ABC Sunday morning "news" show. (I needed a weather report, three inches of snow expected) To paraphrase him, "This is a political football where the rights of one person can overrule the state courts. However, the Supreme Court has already ruled by refusing to hear an appeal and this woman has not been denied her constitutional rights."

The talking head chimed in with questioning if what the congress was doing was even legal. "How can the elected legislative branch think they have the right to overrule the courts?" Another progressive thought, showing support for the courts to dictate and make law instead of just interpreting laws created by the people though elected representation. The MSM is not bias?